|








| | And now Sessional GP Support Teams (SGPSTs) are more important than ever, with the GMC's
announcement on the 14th September 2005 that it will change the basis on
which a doctor’s license to practise is approved in order to include the
requirement to provide information which will support a more risk-based approach
to regulation:
This approach is based on the principle that doctors who may be more at
risk should be subject to a higher degree of scrutiny by the GMC
compared with others, to whom a lighter touch will apply. In the first
instance, the focus will be on doctors working outside a GMC ‘approved
environment’ who do not have an employer at all, or who are employed but
their employer does not have systems in place capable of providing
assurance to the GMC about their fitness to practise.
The GMC would require all doctors to provide information describing
their practice, which may include for example details about the scope of
their work, the name of their employers if any and whether they practise
within their specialty or outside it. An initial information gathering
exercise would require all the UK’s practising doctors (around 120,000)
to provide these details as a condition of being given a licence to
practice.
Where doctors are not working within an approved environment patient and
colleague questionnaires will be used to flag any concerns about fitness
to practise.
The GMC say that changing the way they manage the licensing of doctors
by gathering information about their practice will be a huge step
forward in terms of enabling the GMC to analyse the activities of the
medical workforce accurately.
- Our letter to the
GMC
16th September 2005
- Our report of our meeting 1st December 2005
6th December 2005
- Their reply to us
7th January 2006
- Our press release
10th January 2006
[Back to Sessional GP Support Teams...]
| |
What's with all
these GoogleAds?!
|